First Person Consulting - Research | Evaluation | Design consultants in Melbourne
  • About us
    • Our Vision
    • The Team
    • Opportunities
  • Services
  • Academy
    • Webinars
    • Workshops >
      • Impact through Co-Design and Evaluation (Online)
    • Mentoring
    • Resources
  • Our Work
    • Research
    • Evaluation
    • Design
  • Contact us

Peeling the problem onion - caution, there will be tears

25/11/2016

0 Comments

 
Matt introduces a new concept he's been reflecting on - the problem onion​.
It's been a couple of months since I attended the 2016 Australasian Evaluation Society (AES) Conference with my colleague, Dan Healy (no relation!). We presented three sessions between us and, overall, I think they went pretty well.

I find that it can always be valuable to reflect on these types of experiences to see what you can learn and, hopefully, improve on. This post is not about the sessions we presented, but rather a reflection across the whole conference on something I have affectionately titled the 'problem onion'.
The problem onion is a conceptual image that I have settled on as a good way of thinking about designing programs and projects. Particularly nowadays many of the 'easy wins' have been won - so we now have this blurry amorphous soup known as 'complexity' (or wicked problems) to deal with.

The problem onion is a simple three stage process that I have seen emerge from several projects (and heard about from several others at the AES Conference):
  1. A problem is seen/identified at the start, a project or program is designed in response
  2. Once delivery starts you see that the problem is actually not the same as what it was at the beginning - maybe it changed, or was just plain wrong
  3. By the end, you have identified the real problem. You might have found some good outcomes, but the core issue still exists.
Picture
This is not to say this is universal - simply something I have observed over the last few years. Instances where the problem onion (and accompanying tears) are avoided is when its carved up early.

The use of approaches such as human centred design, evaluative thinking and just plain critical thinking (i.e. is this really a problem in the way that I am assuming) are crucial to dicing up the problem onion and getting those tears out of the way early.

Design and evaluation methods are crucial to this - so I encourage you or anyone you know to think early about how you design and what your design is based on. Many of the complex problems we face are ones I think we can all agree need solving.

Matt Healey, Consultant
​E: matt@fpconsulting.com.au

View my profile on LinkedIn
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    February 2018
    September 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

First Person Consulting is a Melbourne-based consulting firm specialising in social research, program and project design and evaluation in the environmental and social sectors at the local, state and national level.

We also offer training and mentoring packages to build the capacity and capability of staff and teams in organisations across all our areas of work.

Contact us to see how we can help!

You can also sign up to our mailing list.
Follow us:
Picture
Picture
  • About us
    • Our Vision
    • The Team
    • Opportunities
  • Services
  • Academy
    • Webinars
    • Workshops >
      • Impact through Co-Design and Evaluation (Online)
    • Mentoring
    • Resources
  • Our Work
    • Research
    • Evaluation
    • Design
  • Contact us